Case 1601209/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Donovan v Car Clinic (Brynmenyn) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1601209/2020
- Decision date
- 23 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Davies Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Donovan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn the absence of an ET3 response from the respondent, Employment Judge P Davies dealt with the matter under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and said there was sufficient material before the tribunal to make a proper determination. The tribunal upheld the claimant's notice pay claim and his claims for unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay.
The judgment awarded £350 gross for notice pay and £1,579.76 gross in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay, made up of £459.76, £910.00 and £210.00. The bottom-line total was £1,929.76. The tribunal also stated that Mr Donovan is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the sums awarded for unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay (gross). | Upheld | — | £350 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages (gross) of £459.76 and £910.00, plus unpaid holiday pay (gross) of £210.00; the judgment said the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the unpaid wages and holiday pay sums. | Upheld | — | £1,580 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,930
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.