Case 1601214/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Rhiannon Roberts v Master Cabs Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601214/2020
- Decision date
- 16 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Frazer
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Rhiannon Roberts
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge A Frazer, sitting alone in Cardiff, held that Ms Rhiannon Roberts's claims for unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, holiday pay, and failure to provide a statement of employment particulars under s.1 were well founded. The separate claim for unpaid wages was dismissed.
The tribunal found the effective date of termination was 10 February 2020. It also directed that there should be a 50% reduction to the basic award under s.122(2) Employment Rights Act 1996 and a 50% reduction to the compensatory award under s.123(6) Employment Rights Act 1996 to reflect contributory fault.
The judgment did not quantify the final monetary award. It left for the remedies hearing the extent of any loss of earnings award, the degree of any uplift for failure to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice, the number of weeks' pay payable for the s.1 statement claim, and the amount payable for holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Found well founded. The effective date of termination was found to be 10 February 2020. Remedy, including loss of earnings, was left to the remedies hearing, and a 50% reduction to the basic award was ordered to reflect contributory fault. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Found well founded. No quantified award was made in this judgment; remedy issues were left to the remedies hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Found well founded. The amount payable in respect of holiday pay was left to be determined at the remedies hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Claim for failure to provide a s.1 statement of employment particulars was found well founded. The number of weeks' pay payable for this failure was left to the remedies hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim for unpaid wages was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.122(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.123(6) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.