Case 1601225/2023 · Employment Tribunal
IN PERSON FOR THE v Miss Wahabi (litigation Consultant) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1601225/2023
- Decision date
- 30 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Ms S Hurds, Mr C Stephenson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
IN PERSON FOR THE
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sitting at Cardiff on 24, 25 and 26 July 2024, before Employment Judge S Povey with Ms S Hurds and Mr C Stephenson, held that the claimant's complaint of direct discrimination on the grounds of sex was made out and succeeded. The written record identifies the respondent as Brynna Community Centre and records that the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by a litigation consultant.
The decision notice does not set out the tribunal's reasoning beyond the dispositive finding. It states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the standard tribunal procedure. No remedy, award, or further findings are recorded in the text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of direct discrimination on the grounds of sex was made out and succeeded. No separate remedy figure is recorded in the written reasons provided. | Upheld | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.