Case 1601231/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Dawes v 1) Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy 2) Emex Electrical Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601231/2018
- Decision date
- 11 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Dawes
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37. It recorded that by letter dated 28 September 2020 the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal decided that the claim should be struck out.
The extracted judgment does not set out the substantive nature of the underlying claim, and it does not record any monetary remedy or substantive findings on liability. The only outcome recorded is strike out for non-prosecution.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type in the extracted text. It records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued, after the Tribunal invited representations by letter dated 28 September 2020. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.