Case 1601232/2022 · Employment Tribunal
IN PERSON FOR THE v Mr Pomphrey (director) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1601232/2022
- Decision date
- 22 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
IN PERSON FOR THE
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote hearing on 16 May 2023, Employment Judge S Povey found that Ms M Jones's complaints of unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal and unauthorised deductions from wages were made out against Bedwellty Park Residential Home Limited. The judgment records each of those claims as successful.
The tribunal awarded a basic award of £4,504.50 and a compensatory award of £8,820.15 on the unfair dismissal claim. It also awarded £2,734.38 for notice pay on the wrongful dismissal claim and £380.00 for unlawful deductions from wages, making a total monetary award of £16,439.03.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The award for this claim comprised a basic award of £4,504.50 and a compensatory award of £8,820.15. | Upheld | — | £13,325 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal awarded £2,734.38 for notice pay. | Upheld | — | £2,734 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal awarded £380.00 for unlawful deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £380 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,439
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,505
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £8,820
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.