Case 1601233/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Shipley v Lee Maher — 2020
- Case reference
- 1601233/2020
- Decision date
- 1 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harfield Date-
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Shipley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mr M Shipley's claim under rule 37. The reasons state that, by letter dated 23 August 2020, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out on the grounds that the Tribunal appeared to have no jurisdiction, there had been a failure to comply with Tribunal orders, or the claim was not being actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Harfield ordered that the claim be struck out. The extracted judgment does not set out the substantive nature of the claim or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records only that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37. It does not identify the underlying substantive cause of action in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.