Case 1601242/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Bohlin v 1) Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy 2) Emex Electrical Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601242/2018
- Decision date
- 11 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Bohlin
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 28 September 2020, the tribunal gave Mr J Bohlin an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. The judgment records that he did not make representations in writing, did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge S Jenkins struck out the claim under rule 37. The judgment contains no substantive findings on the underlying merits of the claim and records no monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type in the body of the decision; this classification follows the case listing as unlawful deduction from wages. The claim was struck out under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant did not make sufficient written representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.