Case 1601248/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Currie v Park House 20 Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601248/2020
- Decision date
- 23 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Cawthray Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Currie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge G Cawthray heard the case by video on 26 April 2021 after refusing the respondent's late application to postpone. The tribunal found that Mr S Currie was employed by Park House 20 Ltd from 6 February 2020 as an Assistant Manager and was working under the written contract, even though he did not sign it until 18 March 2020. The respondent's case that there was no valid contract because the contract had not been signed was rejected.
The tribunal found that Mr Currie last attended work on 17 March 2020 and was sent home when the restaurant would not open. It accepted that the 25 March 2020 email indicated that staff would be paid when government scheme monies were received, but found that no written furlough agreement was made and that the employment was not terminated on 31 March 2020. The tribunal accepted Mr Currie's account of the 1 April 2020 call and found that he remained employed until 14 May 2020, when he treated the relationship as having broken down. It also found that no notice payment was due because he had not been dismissed and had not given notice of resignation.
The tribunal held that Mr Currie was owed wages for March 2020, April 2020, and 1 to 14 May 2020, totalling £4,226.93, and that this was an unauthorised deduction from wages. It also found that he had accrued 2.12 days of holiday by 14 March 2020 and was owed £171.23 for untaken leave on termination. Separately, the tribunal declared that the respondent had failed to provide itemised pay statements under section 8 ERA 1996 and, because the payslips were provided only after the ET1 and contained errors and unnotified deductions, ordered a further £287.27 under section 12(4) ERA 1996.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages for March 2020 to 14 May 2020; the tribunal found no furlough agreement and no dismissal on 31 March 2020. | Upheld | — | £4,227 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued but untaken leave on termination, calculated at 2.12 days. | Upheld | — | £171 |
| Other | Claim for notice pay failed because the tribunal found Mr Currie was not dismissed and did not give notice of resignation. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Failure to provide itemised pay statements under section 8 ERA 1996; the tribunal ordered £287.27 under section 12(4) for unnotified deductions. | Upheld | — | £287 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,685
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
11 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.25(3) ERA 1996
- s.26 ERA 1996
- s.8 ERA 1996
- s.11 ERA 1996
- s.12(3) ERA 1996
- s.12(4) ERA 1996
- s.221-224 ERA 1996
- Delaney v Staples
- Elizabeth Claire Care Management Ltd v Francis
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.