Case 1601248/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Chandler v Reflex Sales & Marketing Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1601248/2023
- Decision date
- 5 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Chandler
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Wales Employment Tribunals on 4 July 2023. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined that a decision could properly be made under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
In the judgment dated 28 September 2023, the tribunal recorded that Mr A Chandler had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,858. The calculation was stated as 4 x 1.5 x £643.
The judgment did not determine the claimant’s other claims. It stated that the hearing listed on 20 October 2023 would proceed as scheduled to consider those remaining claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Determined on the basis of Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The judgment records that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,858, calculated as 4 x 1.5 x £643. | Upheld | — | £3,858 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,858
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.