Case 1601258/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Charles Paget v Wrexham County Borough Council — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601258/2020
- Decision date
- 2 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ward
- Venue
- Cardiff
- Panel members
- Mr Horne, Mrs Humphries
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Charles Paget
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Charles Paget worked as an assistant team manager in adult social care and the respondent accepted that she was disabled for Equality Act purposes. The tribunal found that the introduction of the SPOA referral system changed how she carried out her work and that the preparation for the change had not been fully thought through. It accepted that the claimant experienced extreme stress, that formal supervision was not always recorded, that a stress risk assessment was not carried out, and that there was a temporary reduction to Statutory Sick Pay without prior notice, which was later apologised for and repaid.
On the constructive dismissal claim, the tribunal considered the alleged failures individually and cumulatively, including the lack of effective guidance, the supervision issues, the absence of a stress risk assessment, the SSP shortfall and the handling of the grievance. It found that a new job description was not required, that grievance handling was appropriate, and that although the situation was difficult and the claimant resigned because of her experience at work, the respondent's conduct did not reach the level of a fundamental breach of trust and confidence.
The disability discrimination claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments also failed. The tribunal was required to consider the identified PCP of requiring the claimant to undertake a new role following the merger of two departments, but it found that this practice was not in place. It referred to Secretary of State for Justice v Prospere [2015] when considering the need to decide the claim by reference to the PCP actually identified. The judgment therefore dismissed the claim in full and recorded no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal found that the respondent's failures, taken singly or cumulatively, did not amount to a fundamental breach of the implied term of trust and confidence. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The reasonable adjustments claim failed because the tribunal did not find the identified PCP of requiring the claimant to undertake a new role following the merger of two departments was in place. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996
- implied term of trust and confidence
- s.20 and s.21 Equality Act 2010
- Secretary of State for Justice v Prospere [2015]
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.