Case 1601279/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Crowther v Queens Hotel (Llandudno) Management Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601279/2020
- Decision date
- 3 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Crowther
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike out judgment in which the Employment Tribunal struck out the claimant's claim against Queens Hotel (Llandudno) Management Ltd. The judgment records that, by letter dated 25 January 2020, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make any sufficient representations explaining why strike out should not occur, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal concluded that the claim should be struck out. No substantive findings were made on the merits of any underlying employment complaint, and no monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive nature of the claim; it was struck out under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's letter dated 25 January 2020. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.