Case 1601291/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Sarah Waite v Caldicot Group Limited Caldicot Fleet Maintenance Recovery Limited (In Administration) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1601291/2022
- Decision date
- 26 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Cawthray Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Sarah Waite
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Cardiff by video on 26 April 2023, Employment Judge G Cawthray ordered that the entire claim against Caldicot Group Limited be struck out under Rule 37(1)(a) of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because it had no reasonable prospect of success. The written judgment does not set out the substantive claim(s) in detail.
The judgment records that Caldicot Fleet Maintenance Recovery Limited (In Administration) was added as a party at the hearing. For the avoidance of doubt, the claim was stated to continue against that respondent. No liability findings or remedy were made in this judgment as against the struck-out respondent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment struck out the entire claim against Caldicot Group Limited under Rule 37(1)(a) on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success. The underlying substantive claim type is not identified in the written judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(a) of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.