Case 1601310/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs E Corbett v Ffestiniog Railway Company — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601310/2020
- Decision date
- 5 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Powell Dated
- Venue
- By telephone & video link
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs E Corbett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Mrs Corbett had been continuously employed by Ffestiniog Railway Company between 16 April 2006 and 8 November 2019, and that she was dismissed on 8 November 2019. Those findings were the only substantive determinations set out in the provided judgment text.
The judgment also records that the claimant's applications to amend her claim were refused. The supplied text does not set out any final liability determination, remedy award, or named legal test beyond those factual findings and the refusal of amendment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The supplied judgment text records preliminary findings that the claimant was continuously employed from 16 April 2006 to 8 November 2019 and that she was dismissed on 8 November 2019. It also states that the claimant's applications to amend her claim were refused. No substantive liability outcome for a pleaded claim is set out in the extracted text. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.