Case 1601310/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs F Blundell-Cureton v Clinton James Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1601310/2023
- Decision date
- 2 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs F Blundell-Cureton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 27 March 2024, sitting at Cardiff by video before Employment Judge S Jenkins, the tribunal recorded a consent outcome on two of the claimant's claims. The claim for a redundancy payment succeeded, and the respondent was ordered to pay £5,304.00 in respect of the claimant's statutory redundancy entitlement. The claim for notice pay also succeeded, and the respondent was ordered to pay £3,120.00 in respect of the balance of the claimant's statutory notice entitlement.
The judgment does not give reasons beyond recording the agreed disposal. It also states that the claimant's remaining claim for unauthorised deductions from wages would be considered at a future hearing, so that issue was not determined in this judgment. The total sum recorded in this judgment is £8,424.00.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Succeeded by consent; the respondent was ordered to pay statutory redundancy entitlement. | Upheld | — | £5,304 |
| Breach of contract | Succeeded by consent; the respondent was ordered to pay the balance of the claimant's statutory notice entitlement. | Upheld | — | £3,120 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,424
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.