Case 1601332/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Brian Davies v Iceland Foods Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1601332/2019
- Decision date
- 17 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Brian Davies
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal rejected the claimant's claim because he had not provided the minimum information required by rule 10(1)(b) of the Employment Tribunals Rules. The missing information identified in the judgment was the claimant's address.
The judgment contains no findings on the merits of the unfair dismissal or unlawful deduction from wages matters indicated by the listing categories, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not adjudicate the merits. The claim was rejected because the claimant failed to provide the minimum information required by rule 10(1)(b), namely his address. | Other | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not adjudicate the merits. The claim was rejected because the claimant failed to provide the minimum information required by rule 10(1)(b), namely his address. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 10(1)(b)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.