Case 1601335/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Goodwin v A.T.D Carpentry Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1601335/2024
- Decision date
- 16 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Harfield Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Goodwin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mr A Goodwin was a worker of A.T.D Carpentry Ltd within the meaning of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and the Employment Rights Act 1996 for the period from 18 January 2021 until termination on 26 January 2024. That worker-status finding formed the basis for the statutory complaints before the tribunal.
The tribunal found that the complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages and holiday pay were well-founded. It awarded the claimant the gross sum of £10,095.00 in respect of those complaints, but the written decision does not split that figure between the two heads of claim.
The tribunal also found that when the proceedings were begun the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars. Under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, the tribunal awarded a further £1,929.00. The total sum awarded by the judgment was therefore £12,024.00.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded. The gross award of £10,095.00 was not split between this complaint and the holiday pay complaint. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the complaint in respect of holiday pay was well-founded. The gross award of £10,095.00 was not apportioned between this complaint and the unauthorised deductions complaint. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | At the start of the proceedings the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars, and the tribunal made an additional award under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £1,929 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,024
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.