Case 1601338/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Megan Kearle v Y Bevan Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1601338/2019
- Decision date
- 7 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beard Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Megan Kearle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Beard decided the case on 4 October 2019 under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013, because the respondent had not filed an ET3 response form. The judgment states that there was sufficient material before the tribunal to make a proper determination.
On that basis, the tribunal upheld the claimant's holiday pay claim and awarded £1,415.60. The judgment does not separate the award into different heads of loss beyond that holiday pay figure.
The judgment also records that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay. Judgment was sent to the parties on 7 October 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal upheld the holiday pay claim in the absence of an ET3 response form and awarded £1,415.60. The judgment also recorded that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £1,416 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,416
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.