Case 1601341/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Kirsty McMullen v The Spicketts Battrick Property Company Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1601341/2018
- Decision date
- 27 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge RL Brace
- Venue
- Pontypridd
- Panel members
- Ms M Walters, Ms M Humphries
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Kirsty McMullen
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Pontypridd on 25 September 2019 before Employment Judge RL Brace, sitting with Ms M Walters and Ms M Humphries. Miss Kirsty McMullen was represented by Ms B Criddle and The Spicketts Battrick Property Company Limited was represented by Ms H Randall.
The judgment records that the claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. No substantive findings of fact or liability were made in the judgment text provided, and no reasons are given beyond the fact of withdrawal.
No remedy was awarded. The judgment therefore records the procedural disposal of the claims only, without any merits determination or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states only that the claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. No merits findings or compensation were recorded. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states only that the claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. No merits findings or compensation were recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.