Case 1601345/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Bailey v Royal Oak Hotel (Betws-Y-Coed) Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1601345/2019
- Decision date
- 1 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Bailey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only substantive disposal recorded in the judgment is that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The document does not contain findings on the merits of any claim, and it does not record any compensatory or other monetary award.
No liability analysis, legal test, or factual determination is set out in the extracted text. The judgment is a brief withdrawal disposal signed by Employment Judge S Jenkins and sent to the parties on 1 November 2019.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No merits finding or remedy is recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No merits finding or remedy is recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.