Case 1601351/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L. Mapp v Outdoor UK Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1601351/2019
- Decision date
- 16 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L. Mapp
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mrs L. Mapp was entitled to receive a redundancy payment from Outdoor UK Ltd. The decision recorded that the calculation was based on her being 50 years old on the effective date of termination, having four years' completed continuous employment, and having a gross weekly wage of £346.61.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £2,079.66 by way of redundancy payment. The respondent was absent, although an ET3 had been presented. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record states that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days, with no such request having been made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment. It calculated the payment on the basis that she was 50 years old on the effective date of termination, had four years' completed continuous employment, and had a gross weekly wage of £346.61. | Upheld | — | £2,080 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,080
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.