Mr M Williams v Ty Mawr Ltd — 2020

Case reference: 1601364/2019
Decision date: 10 September 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge P Davies

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr M Williams

Respondent

Ty Mawr Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The judgment is a short withdrawal order. It records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No findings were made on the substance of the dispute, and the text does not contain any liability analysis or remedy assessment.

The case was brought by Mr M Williams against Ty Mawr Ltd and was listed in the tribunal records as involving breach of contract and unlawful deduction from wages. The judgment itself does not distinguish between those heads of claim or give any separate outcome for each, beyond recording the dismissal of the proceedings after withdrawal.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not set out separate findings on the pleaded heads of claim.	Withdrawn	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not set out separate findings on the pleaded heads of claim.	Withdrawn	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.