Case 1601373/2018 · Employment Tribunal

Mrs I Jones v Healthcare Assistants Limited and 1 other — 2019

Case reference: 1601373/2018
Decision date: 17 May 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge RL Brace

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

3 named

Claimant

Mrs I Jones

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal recorded that the First Respondent had failed to file a response and therefore entered judgment in default against it in favour of Mrs I Jones on liability. The short judgment does not specify the underlying claim type or set out any findings on the merits beyond the default liability order.

The claim against the Second Respondent, Willowmere Home Care Agency Limited, was dismissed because the Claimant withdrew it. No award or remedy was recorded in the judgment, and no legal test was stated in the extracted text.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

This case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The First Respondent failed to file a response, and the Tribunal entered judgment in default in the Claimant's favour on liability. The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying head(s) of claim.	Upheld	—	—
Other	The claim against the Second Respondent was dismissed after the Claimant withdrew it. No merits findings were made against that Respondent in this judgment.	Withdrawn	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.