Case 1601378/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. G. Kulakowski v Silkot (UK) Ltd. — 2023
- Case reference
- 1601378/2022
- Decision date
- 14 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S. Evans Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. G. Kulakowski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal refused the respondent’s application for an extension of time to present its ET3. It then found that the claimant’s claim for unlawful deduction of wages was well-founded and upheld, and also found that the claimant’s claim for entitlement to pay for annual leave accrued and untaken was well-founded and upheld.
The judgment records that the respondent was ordered to pay the sums set out in the decision and to account to HMRC for any tax and national insurance due. The payments specified were outstanding wages, agreed by the respondent, in the sum of £2,866.95 net, and holiday pay for 12 days at £138.46 gross per day, totalling £1,661.54 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Outstanding wages as agreed by the respondent. | Upheld | — | £2,867 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay for 12 days at £138.46 gross per day. | Upheld | — | £1,662 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,528
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.