Case 1601381/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Blackley v Jess Marsh — 2019
- Case reference
- 1601381/2019
- Decision date
- 18 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Davies Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T Blackley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge S Davies determined the claim in the absence of an ET3 response form from the respondent, stating that there was sufficient material before the tribunal to make a proper determination under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal upheld the claimant's unpaid wages claim in the sum of £632.17.
The judgment records that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions that may be due on the sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages. No other claims or remedy components are set out in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal noted that no ET3 response form was presented by the respondent and that there was sufficient material to determine the claim under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. | Upheld | — | £632 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £632
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.