Case 1601391/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D. Stimpson v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1601391/2020
- Decision date
- 6 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr D. Stimpson
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge T.V. Ryan recorded that the claimant had withdrawn two claims, and the tribunal therefore dismissed them: breach of contract (notice) and a claim described as unauthorised deductions from wages and/or non-payment of holiday pay. The dismissal was procedural and followed the claimant's withdrawal rather than any determination on the merits.
The judgment also states that this dismissal did not affect the claimant's disability discrimination claim, which was still being pursued. No remedy was awarded in this judgment, and the record notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days because reasons had been given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed upon the claimant's withdrawal of the notice claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed upon the claimant's withdrawal; the judgment refers to 'unauthorised deductions from wages and/or non-payment of holiday pay'. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.