Case 1601393/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 1601393/2018
- Decision date
- 1 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beard Dated
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal at Carmarthen, sitting on 28 January 2019 before Employment Judge N W Beard, considered a single claim brought by Mrs M Bennett against Hafal. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Miss Ali, Counsel.
The tribunal held that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim, brought within the meaning of section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, was not well founded. The claim was therefore dismissed.
No remedy was awarded and the judgment records no separate compensation figures or other monetary award. The extracted judgment does not identify any additional claims or any panel members besides the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal stated that the claimant's claim of unfair dismissal within the meaning of section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.