Case 1601396/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Haslam v Natalie — 2020
- Case reference
- 1601396/2019
- Decision date
- 2 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Davies Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Haslam
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike out judgment under rule 37. The tribunal recorded that, by letter dated 17 December 2019, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge P Davies struck out the claim. The judgment does not determine the substantive merits of any underlying employment claim and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued. A letter dated 17 December 2019 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, but no sufficient representations were made and no hearing was requested. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.