Case 1601404/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Dallimore v Rickett and Reed Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1601404/2019
- Decision date
- 7 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howden-Evans
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Dallimore
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment on an issue in Ms S Dallimore's unfair dismissal claim against Rickett and Reed Limited. After hearing submissions, considering the claimant's evidence on oath and the bundle, Employment Judge Howden-Evans held that the unfair dismissal claim had been presented within the relevant time limits in the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal's decision was limited to jurisdiction. It found that the claim could proceed because it was in time, but it did not decide the substantive unfair dismissal complaint. The record states that the judge sat alone at Cardiff on 6 January 2020.
No monetary award was recorded in this judgment. The written record also notes that reasons had been given orally and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days of the sending of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Judgment on an Issue only. The tribunal held that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim was presented within the relevant time limits in the Employment Rights Act 1996 and that the tribunal therefore had jurisdiction to hear it. No merits decision was recorded in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.