Miss N Corria v Whitbread Group plc — 2020

Case reference: 1601407/2019
Decision date: 30 January 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge S Jenkins Representation
Venue: Cardiff

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss N Corria

Respondent

Whitbread Group plc

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal considered time-limit issues in Miss Corria's claims against Whitbread Group Plc. It found that the unfair dismissal claim had been brought within the required time period.

The tribunal found that the disability discrimination claim had not been brought within the required time period, but decided that it was just and equitable to extend time. Both the unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claims were therefore allowed to proceed to a final hearing. The judgment did not determine liability or remedy.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The judgment decided that the unfair dismissal claim was brought within the required time period and would proceed to a final hearing; it did not determine the merits of the claim.	Other	—	—
Disability discrimination	The judgment decided that the disability discrimination claim was not brought within the required time period but that it was just and equitable to extend time, so it would proceed to a final hearing; it did not determine the merits of the claim.	Other	Disability	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.