Case 1601412/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Pinchard v Composite Metal Flooring Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1601412/2019
- Decision date
- 4 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Pinchard
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment on withdrawal under rule 52. The only complaint dealt with in the text was a complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages brought by Mr A Pinchard against Composite Metal Flooring Limited.
The tribunal recorded that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was dismissed following a withdrawal by the Claimant. No substantive findings on liability were made in this judgment.
The judgment also states that the Claimant's remaining claims would proceed to hearing as previously notified. No remedy was assessed or awarded in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was dismissed following a withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.