Case 1601414/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Faul v Vibrant Energy Matters Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1601414/2023
- Decision date
- 11 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lloyd-Lawrie
- Venue
- Cardiff
- Panel members
- Mr A Fryer, Mrs D Hebb
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Faul
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Cardiff Employment Tribunal on 6-7 March 2023, a tribunal comprising Employment Judge Lloyd-Lawrie, Mr A Fryer and Mrs D Hebb heard Mr I Faul's claim against Vibrant Energy Matters Ltd. The written judgment records the unanimous decision that the Claimant's claim of direct age discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010 was unfounded and dismissed.
The decision was given orally at the hearing, and the written record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No remedy or compensation was awarded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The tribunal's unanimous judgment was that the Claimant's direct age discrimination claim under section 13 Equality Act 2010 was unfounded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.