Case 1601417/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v E V Downton Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1601417/2023
- Decision date
- 25 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JUDGMENT SENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint. It recorded that, by letter dated 12 November 2023, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the complaint should not be struck out on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint.
The judgment also states that the claimant's remaining claims remained listed for hearing on 25 January 2024. No remedy was assessed in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out after the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 12 November 2023 to make representations or request a hearing on why the complaint should not be struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success. The claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. The judgment states that the remaining claims were still listed for hearing on 25 January 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.