Case 1601427/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Mwendo v Cwmbran Centre for Young People Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1601427/2023
- Decision date
- 26 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jenkins
- Venue
- Cardiff
- Panel members
- Mrs L Bishop, Mr P Bradney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Mwendo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Cardiff on 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23 February 2024 before Employment Judge Jenkins, with Mrs L Bishop and Mr P Bradney as lay members. The written judgment records that the claimant, Mr B Mwendo, brought claims for unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal and direct race discrimination against Cwmbran Centre for Young People Limited.
The judgment states that all three claims failed and were dismissed. No separate reasons are set out in the written record, which notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note appended to the judgment.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment. The written record therefore shows dismissal of the unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal and direct race discrimination claims, with no remedy awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment identifies this as a direct race discrimination claim. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.