Case 1601438/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Weyman v The Secretary of State for Justice — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601438/2020
- Decision date
- 8 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Christensen Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Weyman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the claim. On that basis, the claim was dismissed.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing. No written reasons are included in the judgment unless requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written judgment states only that the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to consider the claim and that the claim is dismissed. It does not identify the legal cause of action adjudicated. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.