Case 1601449/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Goldsmith v Park House 20 Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1601449/2020
- Decision date
- 27 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Goldsmith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss E Goldsmith brought a claim against Park House 20 Ltd. The respondent did not file an ET3 response form. The Employment Judge said there was sufficient material before the tribunal to make a proper determination and, acting under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013, determined the case in the respondent's absence.
The tribunal upheld an unpaid wages claim and awarded gross wages of £295.00. No other claims or remedies are identified in the extracted judgment text, and no split of the award is provided beyond the unpaid wages figure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal proceeded in the absence of an ET3 response form from the respondent and, having sufficient material before it, upheld an unpaid wages claim for gross wages of £295.00 under Rule 21. | Upheld | — | £295 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £295
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.