Case 1601452/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms P Williams v Betterserve UK Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601452/2019
- Decision date
- 5 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Evans Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms P Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs P Williams brought claims against Betterserve UK Limited for unfair dismissal and unauthorised deduction of wages. At the hearing on 18 December 2020, before Employment Judge R Evans, the tribunal held that the unfair dismissal complaint was well founded and succeeded. The judgment does not set out written reasons, stating that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The tribunal dismissed the complaint of unauthorised deduction of wages. In relation to remedy, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £308.00 for loss of statutory rights. No separate breakdown was given for any basic or compensatory award beyond that figure, and no other remedy heads were mentioned in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held the unfair dismissal complaint well founded and recorded compensation of £308.00 for loss of statutory rights. | Upheld | — | £308 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal dismissed the complaint of unauthorised deduction of wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £308
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £308
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.