Case 1601455/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Akhtar v Sasha Jameson Luxury Homes Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1601455/2022
- Decision date
- 16 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Mason Representation
- Venue
- Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Akhtar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge P Mason recorded that the respondent, Sasha Jameson Luxury Homes Ltd, had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr A Akhtar's wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Mr Akhtar the gross sum of £6,666.66 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also ordered the respondent to pay £557.75 as damages for breach of contract. The written record does not set out the underlying facts or any separate reasoning beyond the orders themselves, and no oral reasons were transcribed into the judgment text provided.
The judgment therefore records two upheld claims: unlawful deduction from wages and breach of contract. The total financial outcome recorded in the judgment is £7,224.41.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £6,667 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £558 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,224
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.