Case 1601477/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Y Weldemichael v Gofal Cymru — 2019
- Case reference
- 1601477/2019
- Decision date
- 6 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Davies
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Y Weldemichael
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 15 November 2019, the Tribunal gave Mr Y Weldemichael an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why his claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. He did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment records that the hearing fixed for 10 December 2019 would not take place. The decision was signed by Employment Judge S Davies on 6 December 2019 under rule 37.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued. By letter dated 15 November 2019, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out, but he failed to make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.