Case 1601483/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. A.D. Morgan-Jones v Jelthat Ltd trading as Newport Mazda — 2020
- Case reference
- 1601483/2020
- Decision date
- 28 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. A.D. Morgan-Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy judgment under Rule 21, Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan recorded that the claimant's claims succeeded. The claims found to succeed were unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, unauthorised deductions from wages, failure to pay holiday pay, and breach of contract in relation to payment of commission and bonuses due.
The judgment did not determine remedy. The tribunal directed that a separate Remedy Hearing would be listed by video (CVP) and asked the parties, within 7 days of the judgment being sent, to provide unavailable dates between 1 December 2020 and 30 June 2021 and to say whether they objected to a remote hearing and, if so, why.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract in relation to payment of commission and bonuses due. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.