Case 1601485/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C James v Mabway Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1601485/2020
- Decision date
- 21 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C James
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 14 September 2021, the Tribunal made case management orders giving Mr C James an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why his claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that he had not complied with the order of Regional Employment Judge Davies dated 24 June 2021 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mr James did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying complaint and no award of remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not determine the merits of the underlying complaint. It states that the claim was struck out because the claimant did not comply with the order of Regional Employment Judge Davies dated 24 June 2021 and the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.