Case 1601487/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Wellbeloved v 15:17 Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1601487/2021
- Decision date
- 16 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Wellbeloved
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Wales Employment Tribunals on 10 September 2021. The respondent, 15:17 Limited, did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge decided the claim could be determined under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from Mr R Wellbeloved's wages. It therefore upheld the unlawful deduction from wages claim.
The judgment ordered the respondent to pay Mr Wellbeloved £1,301.78 gross. No separate breakdown of the award beyond that figure is given in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £1,301.78 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,302 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,302
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.