Case 1601490/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Prosser v Stone Supplies (Wales) Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1601490/2019
- Decision date
- 28 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frazer Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Prosser
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Frazer gave judgment on 28 November 2019 in the absence of an ET3 response from Stone Supplies (Wales) Ltd and said there was sufficient material before the tribunal to make a proper determination. The tribunal upheld the claimant's unpaid holiday pay claim, recorded as 96 hours at £11.50 per hour, producing a gross award of £1,104.
The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the sums awarded in respect of unpaid holiday pay. No separate findings were recorded on liability beyond the Rule 21 default judgment, and no other claims or remedies were listed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Default judgment was entered under Rule 21 because the respondent did not present an ET3 response form and there was sufficient material to determine the claim. | Upheld | — | £1,104 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,104
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.