Case 1601492/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Frazer v Pet Rescue Welfare Association Heard: by video — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601492/2020
- Decision date
- 23 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Frazer
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written record states that Miss C Frazer was an employee of Pet Rescue Welfare Association within the meaning of section 230(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. That is the only substantive finding recorded in the judgment text provided.
The record does not set out any further determination on the listed substantive claims, and it records that the reasons were given orally at the hearing. No remedy or monetary award is stated in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written record states only that the claimant was an employee of the respondent within the meaning of section 230(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. No substantive claim outcome or remedy is recorded in the extracted text. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.230(1) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.