Case 1601494/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Whitehall v Hazelwell Care Home Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1601494/2021
- Decision date
- 28 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharp Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Whitehall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms A Whitehall, brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against Hazelwell Care Home Limited. The Tribunal considered whether the complaint should be struck out because the claimant had identified how she could bring an unfair dismissal claim if she did not have 2 years' service with the employer.
By letters dated 26 January 2022 and 18 February 2022, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or to request a hearing on why the complaint should not be struck out. The claimant did not make representations in writing, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal claim. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint after giving the claimant an opportunity by letters dated 26 January 2022 and 18 February 2022 to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out, in light of the issue that she had identified how she could bring an unfair dismissal claim if she did not have 2 years' service. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.