Case 1601495/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S K Cunningham v SAS International Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1601495/2023
- Decision date
- 30 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S K Cunningham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting alone before Employment Judge C Sharp at Cardiff by CVP on 29 November 2023, found that Mr S K Cunningham was not disabled for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010. On that basis, the direct disability discrimination claim and the failure to make reasonable adjustments claim were dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
The Claimant's direct race discrimination claim was withdrawn by him and the written judgment states that it was dismissed. The decision is a short written record only; the reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons are provided in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The Tribunal found the Claimant was not disabled for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010, so the direct disability discrimination and failure to make reasonable adjustments claims were dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The Claimant withdrew the direct race discrimination claim; the written judgment records that it was dismissed. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.