Case 1601497/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Tillery Valley Foods Ltd (in Administration) and Secretary of State for Business and Trade — 2024
- Case reference
- 1601497/2023
- Decision date
- 20 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins
- Panel members
- Mr P Collier, Mr P Pendle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Cardiff by video on 15 August 2024, Employment Judge S Jenkins sitting with Mr P Collier and Mr P Pendle considered Community Union's complaint under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The tribunal found that Tillery Valley Foods Ltd entered administration on 17 May 2023, that all employees employed at that point were dismissed by reason of redundancy, and that those employees were of a description in respect of which the first claimant was recognised by the respondent.
On that basis, the tribunal held that the first respondent had failed to comply with section 188 and that the first claimant's complaint was well founded. It ordered a protective award for all employees employed at the point of administration, equivalent to remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 17 May 2023. The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 were stated to apply.
Because the tribunal had concluded that the relevant employees fell within a description recognised by the first claimant, the individual claims brought by the second to fifth claimants were dismissed. The extracted judgment does not set out any separate monetary figure for the protective award, only the 90-day protected period and the recoupment appendix.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The tribunal held the first claimant's s.189 TULRCA 1992 complaint well-founded and made a protective award for a 90-day protected period beginning on 17 May 2023. | Upheld | — | — |
| Trade union | The judgment states that all other individual claims brought by the second to fifth claimants were dismissed because the tribunal concluded the relevant employees were of a description in respect of which the first claimant was recognised. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- section 188 TULRCA 1992
- section 189 TULRCA 1992
- section 195 TULRCA 1992
- The Bakers' Union v Clarks of Hove Ltd
- In re Hartlebury Printers Ltd
- Susie Radin Limited v GMB
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.