Case 1601499/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Baugh v Jayne Haines and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 1601499/2019
- Decision date
- 27 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms S Baugh
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Brace recorded that no ET3 response form had been presented by the respondents. The tribunal said there was sufficient material before it to make a proper determination and, under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013, upheld the claimant's claims for unfair dismissal, breach of contract, and unpaid wages.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that, in the absence of an ET3 response form and with sufficient material before the tribunal, this claim was upheld on liability only. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that, in the absence of an ET3 response form and with sufficient material before the tribunal, this claim was upheld on liability only. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment uses the phrase 'Unpaid Wages'; this has been mapped to unlawful deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.