Mrs N Howell v Lloyd Bank plc — 2020

Case reference: 1601500/2020
Decision date: 7 May 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Brace

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs N Howell

Respondent

Lloyd Bank plc

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a Rule 52 judgment on withdrawal. Employment Judge Brace recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of claims by the claimant, Mrs N Howell.

The judgment lists two withdrawn claims: a detriment claim described as 'Detrimental treatment pursuant to Section 47 Employment Rights Act 1996' and a claim described as 'Automatic Constructive Unfair Dismissal pursuant to Section 103 Employment Rights Act 1996'. The tribunal made no findings on the merits of either claim.

No remedy, compensation, or other substantive relief was awarded, and the judgment contains no legal analysis beyond recording the withdrawal and dismissal of the proceedings.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	Described only as 'Detrimental treatment pursuant to Section 47 Employment Rights Act 1996'; the extracted text does not state a more specific statutory basis.	Withdrawn	—	—
Constructive dismissal	Described as 'Automatic Constructive Unfair Dismissal pursuant to Section 103 Employment Rights Act 1996'.	Withdrawn	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.