Case 1601504/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L. Lloyd-Thomas v The Governing Body of Christ the Word Catholic School and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 1601504/2022
- Decision date
- 22 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms L. Lloyd-Thomas
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent conceded the claimant's unfair dismissal claim arising from her dismissal on 31 August 2022, and the tribunal recorded that the claim was well-founded and succeeded before Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan at Wrexham by CVP on 16 May 2023.
At the same hearing, the parties reached settlement. The tribunal recorded that the respondents would pay the claimant £43,199.09 subject to tax by 13 June 2023. The hearing was adjourned by consent so the agreed terms could be implemented, with liberty for either party to apply to restore the case if default occurred; if no application was made by 20 June 2023, the claim would be dismissed on deemed withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The respondent conceded the claim. The tribunal recorded that the claimant was unfairly dismissed on 31 August 2022 and that the claim succeeded. The judgment also records a settlement figure of £43,199.09 subject to tax, payable by 13 June 2023. | Upheld | — | £43,199 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £43,199
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.