Case 1601519/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Máté Libics v 2nd Generation Facades Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1601519/2021
- Decision date
- 4 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Macdonald Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Máté Libics
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Libics brought claims for statutory redundancy pay, notice pay, holiday pay and arrears of pay against 2nd Generation Facades Ltd. The respondent did not present a response or attend. The tribunal heard the case on 1 February 2022 and first determined that the wage and holiday claims were in time: it found that the sums became properly payable on 21 May 2021, that early conciliation began on 9 August 2021 within the primary time limit, and that the EC period extended time for presentation. For the contractual notice-pay claim, the tribunal applied Societe Generale v Geys and held that the effective date of termination was 21 May 2021.
The tribunal accepted that Mr Libics worked as a Manufacturing Engineer from 1 January 2018 on 40 hours a week at £14 per hour. It found that he had 18 days of 2020 annual leave remaining on 5 October 2020, that he was told on 3 November 2020 that he was to be made redundant, and that later letters of 23 and 30 April 2021 set out sums said to be due, but payment was not made apart from £350 on 14 May 2021. It found he had 3 completed years' service for redundancy pay and a contractual 4-week notice entitlement. The claimant confirmed that the holiday-pay claim was advanced as a breach of contract claim.
The tribunal awarded £1,632 statutory redundancy pay, £1,714.24 net notice pay, £3,099.04 gross for 27.67 days of accrued but untaken annual leave, and £1,507.60 net for underpaid wages for 6 February to 23 April 2021. It also awarded £209 under s.23(2) ERA 1996 for temporary car repair costs attributable to the underpayment. No award was made for injury to feelings because the tribunal said it had no jurisdiction to make such an award in these proceedings, no ACAS uplift was awarded under s.207A TULR(C)A 1992, and the claimant did not pursue pension loss. The total payable was £8,161.88.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy pay; tribunal found 3 completed years' service and applied the statutory week's-pay cap of £544. | Upheld | — | £1,632 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay / contractual claim; tribunal found a 4-week notice entitlement and used net weekly pay of £428.56. | Upheld | — | £1,714 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued but untaken annual leave; the claimant confirmed this claim was advanced as breach of contract, and the tribunal found 27.67 days due at termination. | Upheld | — | £3,099 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Underpaid wages of £1,507.60 plus £209 compensation under s.23(2) ERA 1996 for temporary car repair costs attributable to the underpayment. | Upheld | — | £1,717 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,162
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.23(2) ERA 1996
- s.7 and s.8B Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) (England and Wales) Order 1994
- Societe Generale, London Branch v Geys [2012] UKSC 63
- s.207A TULR(C)A 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.